Ashok Nagar v. National Council for Teacher Education & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R
% 10.07.2017
The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 07.12.2016 passed u/s 17 of the National Council for Teachers’ Education Act, 1993 (NCTE). This order is at page 82 of the paper book.
At the outset, this Court has put a query to the learned counsel for the petitioner that if an appeal lies against that order. Section 17 of the NCTE is very clear. It states that any person aggrieved by an order made under Section 14 or Section 15 or Section 16 may prefer an appeal to the Council under Section within such a period as may be described.
At this state, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty granted to him to avail of the alternate remedy. Permission is granted.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
JULY 10, 2017 A
Ashok Nagar
National Council for Teachers Education
Indereemmet Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court