Rohit Kakkar v. Aakansha Kakkar
Case brief
What is this about?
Sole order disposing of a withdrawal application and another criminal miscellaneous application without substantive reasoning or legal issue.
What did the court decide?
Leave to withdraw appeal allowed; appeal disposed as withdrawn; Crl.M.A. allowed subject to exceptions.
What the court decided
$~33
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.A. 1089/2013 ROHIT KAKKAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Susheel Kr. Tiwari, Adv. versus
AAKANSHA KAKKAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, APP for State with SI Hawa Singh, P.S. Madhu Vihar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 07.07.2017
Crl. M.A. 10545/2017
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application is disposed of.
Crl. M.A. 10544/2017 (Withdrawal of Appeal)
By this application, appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal.
Application is allowed and appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Application is disposed of.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rohit Kakkar
- respondent
Aakansha Kakkar
Coram
A.K. Pathak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court