The Court quashed FIR No. 546/2013 under Sections 354/509 IPC, alleging assault and insult to modesty, noting the dispute was amicably settled by the complainant without fear or pressure. Costs of Rs. 20,000 directed to be deposited in PM Relief Fund.
Quashing of FIR No. 546/2013 and all proceedings arising therefrom; Deposit of Rs. 20,000 towards costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
PANKAJ SHARMA ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr.Varun Kumar, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC with Mr.Piyush Singhal, Advocate. Mr.Sarvesh Kumar, Advocate for R2 along with R2 in person. SI Sanjeev.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R
% 05.02.2016
page 1 of 2
W.P.(CRL) 382 /2016
S.P.GARG, J
FEBRUARY 05, 2016 / tr
page 2 of 2
W.P.(CRL) 382 /2016
2 issues framed by the court
Whether FIR Nos. 354/509 IPC should be quashed in the interest of justice upon settlement.
Whether the petition is maintainable in view of the settlement between parties.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
PANKAJ SHARMA
STATE
respondent No.2
S.P. GARG
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
