Petitioners failed to appear at two calls. Court dismissed the writ petition in default and non-prosecution, noting police had already informed petitioners of safeguards.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
RUKHSAR KHAN & ANR ..... Petitioners
versus
THE STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for State. ASI Rambir Singh, PS Geeta Colony.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
O R D E R % 08.02.2016
None appears on behalf of the petitioners on the second call. There was no appearance on behalf of the petitioners on the first call either.
It has been pointed out on behalf of the police that the petitioners have already been provided with the necessary information qua the beat Constable as well as the Division Officer of the concerned police station so as to enable them to approach the former in the event of any threat or apprehension.
However, since none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners, the present writ petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution and disposed of accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
FEBRUARY 08, 2016 sr
Rukhsar Khan & Anr
The State & Ors
Siddharth Mridul
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
