Allowed

Bir Singh & Ors. v. the State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Delhi HC5 Feb 2016W.P.(CRL)/226/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single-judge bench allowed two joint Writ Petitions seeking quashing of FIRs for assault. The court found disputes were resolved amicably via a dated December 1, 2016, agreement. The court quashed the proceedings subject to the petitioners depositing Rs. 2,500 in the Victims' Compensation Fund.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of FIRs 846/2014 and 847/2014 subject to deposit of Rs. 2,500 in the Victims' Compensation Fund within two weeks.

Bir Singh & Ors. Vs the State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA

¶2

respondent No. 2 in W.P.(CRL) 226/2016 alleging that the petitioner had assaulted her and her family members on the night of^041h August, 2014 after switching off the street light.

¶3

FIR No. 847/2014 was registered on a complaint instituted by respondent No. 2, Mr. Veer Singh against the petitioner in W.P.(CRL) 157/2016 to the effect alleging that the latter i.e. the petitioner assaulted him and his family members on the night 0f04th August, 2014.

¶4

A perusal of the respective FIRs reveals that the present altercation took place as a consequence over a trivial dispute over the switching off of municipal street light. Senseless violence seems to have become endemic to the city of Delhi.

¶5

Counsel appearing on behalf of the parties in both the petitions state that with the aid and intervention of the neighbours from the locality where they reside the parties in the subject FIRs have resolved their disputes amicably. The terms of the compromise are enshrined in a deed of compromise dated 01st December, 2016. The salient conditions are as follows:-

¶6

"As per the settlement both parties will approach to the Hon'ble High Court for quashing of the FIR within 7 days of signing of this agreement.

¶7

It was also settled that both parties will not lodge any FIR/complaint against the other party, in future, regarding the present issue and it was also settled between the parties, if any complaint is filed by any parties to any authority either it will be withdrawn OR otherwise it will be treated as null and void.

¶8

The present settlement is final and has been reached without any coercion, undue influence, Fraud etc between both the parties.

¶9

Both parties shall be bound by the above said settlement and shall co-operate with each other in getting the F.I.Rs quashed."

¶10

W.P.('cRL) 226/2016 & WP.('CRL) 157/2016

¶11

Page No. 213

¶12

¶13

Better sense seems to have prevailed.

¶14

The complainants who are present in person, have been identified by the JO SI Pratap Singh, Police Station-Uttam Nagar.

¶15

In view of the foregoing since the disputes that led to the registration of the subject FIRs have been resolved amicably between the parties, no useful purpose would serve by proceeding with the present FIRs.

¶16

Resultantly, the FIR No.846/2014, under Sections 308/3 54B/323/506/34 of the IPC, registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar and FIR No.847/2014, under Sections 308/323/341/34 of the IPC, registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar and the proceedings arising therefrom are hereby set aside and quashed qua all the petitioners subject to each of the petitioners depositing a sum of Rs. 2,500/- with the Victims' Compensation Fund within a period of two weeks from today. A copy of the receipt thereof shall be provided to the Investigating Officer in the subject FIRs.

¶17

With the above said directions, the writ petition is 4lowed and disposed of accordingly.

¶18

HARTH MRIDUL, J

¶19

FEBRUARY 05, 2016 sr

¶20

W.P.(CRL) 226/2016 & W.P.(CRL) 157/2016

¶21

Page No. 313

Bir Singh & Ors. v. the State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bir Singh & Ors. v. the State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhimanyu @ Shyam Vs State

Pooja Sharma Vs State ( NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Manish Jain Vs Commissioner of Police Delhi & Ors.

Vishal @ Nanu & Ors. Vs State ( NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Moti Khan Vs State

Rukhsar Khan & Anr. Vs the State & Ors.

Sanjay Kumar Gupta & Ors. Vs State & Anr.

Sharad Anugonda & Ors. Vs State (Govt of NCT Delhi) & Anr.

Abhimanyu @ Shyam Vs State

Pooja Sharma Vs State ( NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Manish Jain Vs Commissioner of Police Delhi & Ors.

Paras Ram & Ors. Vs the State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Himanshu Bist & Golu Vs the State

Suresh Kumar Gupta Vs Union of India & Ors.