Quashed

Atik Gile @ Atik Gill v. State & Anr.

Delhi HC13 Jan 2016CRL.M.C./141/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.P. Garg quashed FIR No. 1019/14 under Sections 354/323 IPC as the petitioner voluntarily settled the dispute with the complainant without fear or pressure, serving no useful purpose for further proceedings.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 1019/14 and all proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed; petitioner to deposit cost of `25,000/- with Prime Minister Relief Fund.

Atik Gile @ Atik Gill Vs State & Anr. — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~35

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 141/2016 & Crl.M.A.574/2016

¶4

ATIK GILE @ ATIK GILL

¶5

..... Petitioner Through : Mr.D.S.Kohli with Mr.Asshmeet Singh and Mr.A.Sherawat, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Raghuvinder Varma, APP. Mr.Rahul Ranjan Verma, Advocate, for the complainant/R-2 along with complainant present in person. ASI Raj Kumar, PS Safdarjung Enclave.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

¶7

O R D E R % 13.01.2016

¶8

(1) Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.1019/14 under Sections 354/323 IPC registered at Police Station Safdarjung Enclave. It is stated that the matter has been settled with the complainant/respondent No.2 amicably. (2) Respondent No.2-complainant is present before the Court along CRL.M.C. 141/2016 Page 1 of 2

¶9

with her counsel. The Investigating Officer has identified her. I have enquired from the complainant whether the matter has been settled with the petitioner amicably without fear and pressure. She has informed that the matter has been settled without any fear or pressure and she has no objection to the quashing of the FIR.

¶10

(3) The petition is supported by the affidavits of the parties.

¶11

(4) Since the petitioner has voluntarily settled the dispute with the complainant, no useful purpose will be served to continue with the proceedings. In the interest of justice and to put an end to the litigation, FIR No.1019/14 under Sections 354/323 IPC registered at Police Station Safdarjung Enclave and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

¶12

(5) The petitioner is, however, burdened with cost of `25,000/- to be deposited with Prime Minister Relief Fund within two weeks. The Registry shall ensure the compliance of the order.

¶13

(6) The petition and all pending application(s) stand disposed of accordingly.

S.P.GARG, J.

JANUARY 13, 2016

CRL.M.C. 141/2016

Page 2 of 2

Atik Gile @ Atik Gill v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Atik Gile @ Atik Gill v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonu Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Baij Nath Paswan & Ors. Vs the State ( NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Rahul Parikh Vs the State

Wazir Singh & Anr. Vs the State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Deepak Saini Vs the State ( NCT of Delhi)

Md. Salauddin Vs State