CBI v. Raja Bhattacharya
Case brief
What is this about?
CBI petitions for cancellation of bail granted to respondents charged with human trafficking and forced prostitution. Court finds no sufficient reason to interfere with the reasoned bail order. Bail upheld.
What did the court decide?
Petitions for cancellation of bail were dismissed. All pending applications were disposed of.
What the court decided
$-20 to 22 *** IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI**
DECIDED ON : 14th JANUARY, 2016
- CRL.M.C. 4523/2014
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Abhishek Chauhan, Advocate, for Ms.Sonia Mathur, Standing Counsel. versus RAJA BHATTACHARYA ..... Respondent Through : None.
+ CRL.M.C. 413/2015 & CRL.M.A.No.1627/2015
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Abhishek Chauhan, Advocate, for Ms.Sonia Mathur, Standing Counsel. versus IMTIAZ ALI & ORS ..... Respondents Through : None. AND
- CRL.M.C. 1640/2015 & CRL.M.A.No.5951/2015
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Abhishek Chauhan, Advocate, for Ms.Sonia Mathur, Standing Counsel.
Crl.M.C. 4523/2014 & connected matters.
Page 1 of 6
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether sufficient reasons exist for cancellation of bail granted in a case involving human trafficking and sexual exploitation of a minor.
Whether the trial court erred in appreciating the evidence when granting bail to the respondents.
Whether the respondents should be held in custody in perpetuity given the length of the trial and lack of specific risks.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
- respondent
RAJA BHATTACHARYA
- respondent
AJAY CHAUDHARY @ AJAY
- respondent
IMTIAZ ALI
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court