Tarun Kumar Banjaree v. Rajiv Mehrishi & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the contempts petition after the respondents assured compliance with a prior Supreme Court judgment via a State Government letter.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CONT.CAS(C) 932/2015
TARUN KUMAR BANJAREE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chibber, Advocate
versus
RAJIV MEHRISHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Ms. Shreya Sinha and Ms. Ruchi Jain, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
%
O R D E R 22.01.2016
- The petitioner is aggrieved by the non-compliance of the judgment dated 25th May, 2015 by the respondents.
- Mr. Sanjay Jain, learned ASG, submits that the Ministry of Home Affairs has taken a conscious decision to implement the judgment dated 25th May, 2015. It is submitted that the judgment dated 25th May, 2015 has been challenged by private respondents before the Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (C) No.20582-20583/2015 in which the Government has moved an application for permission to implement the judgment dated 25th May, 2015 subject to the outcome of the special leave petition. It is submitted that Government shall comply with the directions given by Supreme Court in the Special Leave petition with respect to the compliance of the judgment dated 25th May, 2015.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Tarun Kumar Banjaree
- respondent
Rajiv Mehrishi
Coram
J.R. Midha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court