T M Sampath v. S M Husain
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt proceeding, the High Court of Delhi disposed of the petition after the respondent paid the ordered sum. The Court directed the respondent to pay costs of 15,000/- to the harassed petitioner.
What did the court decide?
Respondent directed to pay costs of 15,000/- to the petitioner within two weeks.
What the court decided
$~10
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CONT.CAS(C) 911/2015
T M SAMPATH ..... Petitioner
Through : Petitioner in person. versus
S M HUSAIN ..... Respondent
Through : Sh. R.V. Sinha, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
O R D E R % 20.01.2016
The respondents have issued an Office Order dated 18.01.2016 releasing the sum of `1,05,414/- to the petitioner, who complains of contempt of the Court’s order. The petitioner, who represents himself, submits that the orders of Court have now been complied with.
The respondents submit that they do not have the petitioner’s permanent address. The petitioner discloses it to be: House No.34, Banashankari Third Stage, 1st Block, Bangalore-560 085.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T M Sampath
- respondent
S M Husain
Coram
S. Ravindra Bhat
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court