The respondent in court handed over keys to the subject premises. The petitioner, thereupon, withdrew the petition, which was disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SANATAM DHARAM SABHA LAXMI NARAIN TEMPLE RUST ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Aggarwal, Adv.
versus
SHANTI DEVI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.P. Pandey, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 12.01.2016
The respondent present in Court along with her counsel has handed over the keys in respect of the subject premises to the petitioner in Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the keys of the subject premises handed over by the respondent today in Court, the petitioner does not press this petition.
The petition is disposed of as not pressed.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
JANUARY 12, 2016 ak
Sanatam Dharam Sabha Laxmi Narain Temple Rust
Shanti Devi
J.R. Midha
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
