Single judge order dismissing a petition as withdrawn following a settlement between the parties where respondents agreed to withdraw an assessment order.
Petition and pending applications dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ASHOK KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Fanish K. Jain, Adv. versus
PREM KUMAR, CEO BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Srivastava, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
%
O R D E R 17.05.2016
Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled the matter. As per the settlement, the respondents shall withdraw the assessment order dated 2nd July, 2015 and the bill raised pursuant thereto.
BSES Yamuna Power Limited has further agreed not to take any action against the petitioner on the basis of inspection dated 9th May, 2012.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not press this petition in view of the settlement.
The petition and the pending applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
MAY 17, 2016 dk
ASHOK KUMAR
PREM KUMAR, CEO BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
