Partly allowed
Surinder Mohan Anand v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/4116/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~62
SURINDER MOHAN ANAND ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeet Singh, Advocate versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R
% 09.05.2016
C.M. Appl. 17360/2016
Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 4116/2016 & C.M. Appl. 17359/2016
Issue notice. Learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice. Let the copy of this writ petition be treated as petitioner’s representation to be considered by the respondents after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Let a decision on the representation of the petitioner be taken by speaking order within a period of eight weeks from today. The copy of the order be communicated to the petitioner within 10 days of passing of the order.
The writ petition and C.M. Appl. 17359/2016 are disposed of in the above terms.
Copy of this order be given dasti to counsels for the parties under signatures of the Court Master.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
MAY 09, 2016 rsk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether notice under Article 226 should be issued and petition disposed of with a mandate to represent followed by a speaking order within 8 weeks.
Surinder Mohan Anand
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
J.R. Midha
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court