The High Court of Delhi allowed the withdrawal of a writ petition regarding the petitioner's posting to Silchar, subject to exceptions, and granted liberty to challenge the respondents' decision.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge respondents' decision in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~56
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ABHAY KUMAR BHARGAVA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Subhash Chandra Vashishth, Mr. Pankaj Sniha and Ms. Nupur Grover, Advs. versus K K SHARMA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Abhishek Khanna, G.P. and Mr. Raj Kamal, D.C, BSF. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 04.05.2016
CM No.16451/2016
Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
CONT.CAS(C) 513/2016 & CM No.16450/2016
withdraw this petition with liberty to challenge the decision taken by the respondents in accordance with law.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
MAY 04, 2016 ak
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to challenge the decision is permissible.
ABHAY KUMAR BHARGAVA
K K SHARMA & ANR.
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
