The High Court directed respondents to issue a fresh show cause notice and afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before suspending their licence, in compliance with procedural rules.
Direction to respondents to issue a fresh show cause notice and afford an opportunity of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~59
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SANT HARBHAJAN SOCIAL WELFARE SOCIETY..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Ruchika Sharma, Adv.
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohd. Irsad, proxy counsel for Mr. Rishikesh Kumar, Adv. for R2 with Ms. Neha Rastogi, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 04.05.2016
respondents, the petitioner would be at liberty to file appropriate legal remedies available to the petitioner in accordance with law.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
MAY 04, 2016 ak
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suspension of the petitioner’s licence was passed in violation of the audi alteram partem rule.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sant Harbhanj Social Welfare Society
Govt. of NCT of Delhi
J.R. Midha
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
