Single Judge upheld withdrawal of a petition granting liberty to claim damages for a dilapidated flat condition, dismissing the grievance that lack of restoration prior to handover violated the Division Bench order.
Petition and pending application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to claim damages from respondent No.1.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
LAL S VASWANI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. (appearance not given), Adv.
versus
VIRENDER KUMAR YADAV & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC for GNCTD with Ms. Astha Nigam, Adv. Mr. Harsh Chandra, Adv. for R1. Mr. S.K. Nalia, Adv. for R3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
%
O R D E R 03.05.2016
grievance of the petitioner is that flat is in a dilapidated condition and respondent No.1 was liable to restore the same in good condition before handing over the possession.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
MAY 03, 2016 ak
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow withdrawal of the petition with liberty to claim damages for dilapidated condition of the flat.
Whether the petitioner's grievance regarding dilapidated condition violates the Division Bench order dated 10.02.2016.
LAL S VASWANI
VIRENDER KUMAR YADAV
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
