Allowed a petition seeking a de-novo inquiry into irregularities, subject to exceptions. Dismissed an ancillary contempt petition, allowing the petitioner to seek appropriate legal remedies against the inquiry report.
De-novo inquiry ordered subject to just exceptions; contempt petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MUKESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Yashish Chandra and Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advs.
versus
RAMESH CHAND & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vivekanand Mishra, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 02.05.2016
CM No.15723/2016
Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
CONT.CAS(C) 482/2016
remedies available to him against the inquiry report in accordance with law.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
MAY 02, 2016 ak
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a de-novo inquiry should be ordered as the ongoing inquiry was conducted irregularly?
Whether the current contempt petition regarding the conduct of the inquiry is maintainable?
Mukesh Kumar
Ramesh Chand & Anr.
J.R. Midha
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
