Petitioner moved to withdraw the writ petition citing an amicable settlement. The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition and pending applications dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MAHENDER PAL GOYAL .... Petitioner Through: Ms. Sharda, Advocate.
versus
TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LIMITED..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Srivstava, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R
%
13.01.2016
[
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been amicably settled and, therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition.
The petition and the pending applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
JANUARY 13, 2016 ak
MAHENDER PAL GOYAL
TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LIMITED
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
