Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition regarding territorial jurisdiction and to approach another respondent for sentence suspension to file an appeal. Court granted leave and disposed of the petition.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition to approach respondent No.3 for suspension of sentence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22.
NABIN KISHORE CHOUHAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajinder Kumar, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Prasant Verma, Advocate with Mr. Pradeep Jha, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA
O R D E R
% 12.01.2016
the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition while reserving the right of the petitioner to approach the respondent No.3
W.P.(C) 260/2016 Page 1 of 2
to seek suspension of his sentence to enable him to file an appeal, in
terms of the Sahastra Seema Bal Act and Rules.
HIMA KOHLI, J
R.K. GAUBA, J
JANUARY 12, 2016 rkb/ap
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 260/2016
Nabin Kishore Chouhan
Union of India
Hima Kohli
R.K. Gauba
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
