Disposed
Sh. Deb Dulal Halder v. D.D.A.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/612/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SH. DEB DULAL HALDER ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Adv.
versus
D.D.A. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey and Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 12.01.2016
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent has carried out the mini draw on 30th December, 2015 and the allotment has been made to the petitioner. It is further submitted that the demand/allotment letter shall be issued to the petitioner in due course.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the allotment made by the respondent to the petitioner, the petitioner does not press the petition. Learned counsel however seeks liberty to approach this Court if the demand/allotment letter not issued within a reasonable time.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending applications are disposed of.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
JANUARY 12, 2016 ak
SH. DEB DULAL HALDER
D.D.A.
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court