The High Court of Delhi, in this writ petition, allowed the application and directed the Land Acquisition Collector to pass a supplementary award for trees omitted from the main award within eight weeks.
A supplementary award to be made in respect of trees within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
BHAGWAN YADAV ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr S. K. Rout
versus
LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, DISTRICT NORTH ..... Respondent Through : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
O R D E R
%
18.01.2016
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. This petition has been filed seeking a direction that a supplementary award be passed in respect of trees which has been left out from the main award.
After hearing the counsel for the parties, we allow this writ petition to this extent and direct that the Land Acquisition Collector shall make a supplementary award in respect of the trees in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from today.
The writ petition stands disposed of.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
JANUARY 18, 2016 SR
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Land Acquisition Collector is directed to make a supplementary award in respect of trees left out from the main award.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
BHAGWAN YADAV
LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, DISTRICT NORTH
BADAR DURREZ AHMED
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
