Ratani Kaul v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court declared that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act initiated before the 2013 Act's commencement lapsed due to non-payment of compensation, allowing the petitioner a declaration under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
What did the court decide?
Declaration that the acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act were deemed to have lapsed and the writ petition was allowed to that extent.