Petitioner withdrew the writ petition after vacating premises and surrendering connection. Court dismissed the petition and ordered refund of deposited amount with interest.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; deposit of Rs.15,000 with interest to be refunded to petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
GURU DUTT SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Mahipal, Advocate
versus
BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD AND ANOTHER..... Respondents Through: Mr. Deepak K. Vijay, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Jatin Rajput and Mr. Anupam Dubey, Advocates for respondent No.2
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 12.02.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition on the ground that the petitioner has vacated the subject premises and has surrendered the connection to respondent No.1.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The amount of Rs.15,000/- deposited by the petitioner in terms of order dated 29th July, 2013 along with interest accrued thereon be refunded back to the petitioner.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
FEBRUARY 12, 2016 rsk
GURU DUTT SHARMA
BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
