Mohd. Sayeed v. Shanti & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In the absence of appearance by the appellant on multiple dates, the appeal was dismissed. The interim order was vacated, allowing respondents to seek 50% of the compensation award from the Commissioner.
What the court decided
$~23
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- FAO 158/2008
MOHD. SAYEED ..... Appellant Through: NEMO.
versus
SHANTI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal and Mr. Tenzing Thinlay Lepcha, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 12.02.2016
There is no appearance on behalf of the appellant. No one appeared on his behalf on 04th September, 2015 as well as on 06th November, 2015. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
The interim orders are vacated. The respondents are at liberty to seek release of 50% award amount from the Commissioner, Employees’ Compensation.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mohd. Sayeed
- respondent
Shanti & Ors.
Coram
J.R. Midha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court