The High Court held it lacks pecuniary jurisdiction over ordinary suits exceeding value limits. Consequently, the suit is transferred to the District & Sessions Judge (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, for trial.
Suit transferred to the District & Sessions Judge (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~34
SHRI RAMESH GROVER ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. R.K. Modi, Advocate.
versus
SHRI BALDEV KHOSLA & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 10.02.2016
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
FEBRUARY 10, 2016/ Ne
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Court has pecuniary jurisdiction to try the suit given the Office Order dated 24.11.2015.
To whom the suit should be transferred for trial.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Shri Ramesh Grover
Shri Baldev Khosla & Ors.
Valmikij Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
