Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the quashing of the electoral process and allegations against petitioners, noting petitioners had approached the Delhi Cooperative Tribunal on the same issue.
The writ petition is dismissed. No relief can be granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Amit Singh, Adv. for R-1 to 3 along with Asstt. Registrar/RCS. Mr.Sunil Sabharwal, Adv.& Mr.Chirag Babbar, Adv. for R-4.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
It is transpired during the course of the hearing that the petitioner’s grievance apart from the claim made for quashing of the electoral process initiated on 29.11.2013 and the subsequent order-in respect of their allegations that they cannot be treated as defaulters. It is an admitted fact that the petitioners have approached the Delhi Cooperative Tribunal which is seized of the same issue.
In circumstances, no relief can be granted. All rights & contentions available in law are reserved.
The Writ petition is dismissed.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
FEBRUARY 11, 2016/ neelam
R.K. Anand & Ors.
Govt. of NCT of Delhi
S. Ravindra Bhat
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
