Counsel for the petitioner was granted leave to withdraw the writ petition to challenge a demolition order, which the court has disposed of accordingly.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition; petition disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~64
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Vikas Chopra, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 18.01.2016
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that demolition order has already been passed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that demolition order has been received on 15th January, 2016 in Court itself. He further submits that he would challenge the demolition order before the
MCD Appellate Tribunal. He seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition. Present writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
JANUARY 18, 2016/ dk
RAJNISH SINHA
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
A.K. PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
