Ajay Seth & Anr. v. Supriya
Case brief
What is this about?
This order transfers a civil suit to the District & Sessions Judge (South East) Saket Courts due to pecuniary jurisdiction limits under Section 4 of the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 2015.
What did the court decide?
Suit transferred to District & Sessions Judge (South East) Saket Courts; parties to appear on 2nd March, 2016.
What the court decided
$~46
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CS(OS) 587/2012
AJAY SETH & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. F. Hasan, Advocate.
versus
SUPRIYA ..... Defendant
Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 14.01.2016
I.A. No.19127/2015 (restoration) & 19128/2015 (condonation of delay)
- An Office Order dated 24.11.2015 has been issued by Hon’ble the Chief Justice in exercise of powers conferred by Section 4 of the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 2015, whereby ordinary suits which are not commercial matters having pecuniary jurisdiction up to the value of rupees two crores cannot be tried by this Court and commercial matters up to the value of rupees one crore cannot be tried by this Court. Accordingly, this suit is transferred for decision to the jurisdictional Court under the District & Sessions Judge (South East) Saket Courts, New Delhi.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit requires transfer to a subordinate court based on pecuniary jurisdiction limits under the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 2015.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ajay Seth & Anr.
- respondent
Supriya
Coram
Valmiki J. Mehta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court