The Delhi High Court allowed W.P.(C) 339/2016 and C.M. Appl. 1384/2016, permitting the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition subject to producing a public interest litigation in accordance with law.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw writ petition with liberty to file a public interest litigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
HAZRAT NIZAMUDDIN WELFARE ASSOCIATION .... Petitioner Through: Mr. M.T. Malik and Mr. Mujeeb Ahmed, Advocates
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal and Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Standing Counsels for respondent No.1 Mr. Wayeeh Shafiq and Ms. Ekta Verma, Advocates for respondent No.2
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 15.01.2016
C.M. Appl. 1384/2016
Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 339/2016
After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a public interest litigation.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdraw with liberty to file a public interest litigation in accordance with law.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
JANUARY 15, 2016 rsk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a public interest litigation should be allowed.
Hazrat Nizamuddin Welfare Association
Delhi Development Authority
Respondent No. 2
J.R. Midha
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
