Allowed
N C Bakshi v. Anil Khanna & Ors.
Delhi HCCONT.CAS(C)/41/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~48
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
N C BAKSHI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tanuj Khurana, Advocate
versus ANIL KHANNA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sangram Patnaik and Mr. Rajiv Gupta, Advocates for respondent Nos.2 & 3 Mr. Ajay Arora and Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocates for SDMC/ respondent Nos.4 & 5 Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC and Mr. Sanjeev K. Balyan, Advocate for respondent Nos.7 & 9
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 15.01.2016
C.M. Appl. 1531/2016
Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
CONT.CAS(C) 41/2016 & C.M. Appl. 1530/2016
After some hearing, Mr. Harish Malhotra, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail legal remedies available to the petitioner including the filing of a fresh writ petition.
This petition and the application are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
JANUARY 15, 2016 rsk
N C BAKSHI
ANIL KHANNA
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court