The petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach appropriate authorities if a future demand is raised. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Dismissal of the writ petition with liberty to seek remedies in case of a future demand.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
M/S. EXPLO MEDIA PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through : Mr Avadh Kaushik with Ms Deepika Raghav
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through : Mr Mukesh Gupta along with Mr Rajendra Chauhan (CO, Advt.), SDMC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
%
O R D E R 10.03.2016
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has instructions to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to take recourse to such remedies as may be available to him in case a demand is raised.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
MARCH 10, 2016 SR
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
M/S. EXPLO MEDIA PVT LTD
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
BADAR DURREZ AHMED
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
