The High Court of Delhi allowed exemption in a writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition due to inaccuracies, noting no substantive decision on rights or merits.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SHAKUNTLA DEVI ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr V.S.Tomar, Advocate.
versus
GOVT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for L&B/LAC/R-1 & 2. Ms Mrinalini Sen and Ms Mrinmoi Chatterjee, Advocates for R-3/DDA.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
O R D E R
% 11.03.2016 CM No.8929/2016 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C)2082/2016 & CM No.8930/2016 (stay)
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. This is so because certain inaccuracies have crept into the writ petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
MARCH 11, 2016 ‘sn’
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition can be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition to correct inaccuracies.
Shakunthla Devi
Govt of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Ors
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
