Opposition disposed due to lack of instructions from the Petitioner. The Petitioner was ordered to release the deposited amount to the Respondent along with interest.
Petitioner directed to release deposited amount to Income Tax Department with interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI R-103
versus
CIT DELHI-XIII, NEW DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Rahul Chaudhary, Senior Standing Counsel.
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 11.03.2016
S. MURALIDHAR, J
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
MARCH 11, 2016/ pkv
Aerotex Trade International
CIT Delhi-XIII
S Muralidhar
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
