This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI R-88
M/S. LOVELY ENTERPRISES ..... Petitioner Through: None.
versus
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. K.K. Tyagi with Mr. Iftekhar Ahmed, Advocates for CWC. Mr. Rahul Kaushik with Mr. Bhavishya Sharma, Advocates for Customs.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R
% 09.03.2016
None appears for the Petitioner when the matter is called out. It seems that the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing this petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. The pending applications also stand dismissed. The application for restoration will be entertained only if it is supported by the affidavit of the party concerned.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
MARCH 09, 2016/ Rk
M/S. LOVELY ENTERPRISES
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS & ORS
S.MURALIDHAR
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
