Ravinder Yadav v. Bses and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
This single-line order directs the respondent electricity board to treat the writ petition as a representation and pass an appropriate order.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and pass an appropriate order.
What the court decided
$~A-21
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 1485/2016 and CM Appl. 6470/2016 RAVINDER YADAV ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner-in-person.
versus
BSES AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate for R- 1. Mr.Udit Gupta, Advocate for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
O R D E R % 09.03.2016
Shri Deepak Pathak, Advocate accepted notice for respondent No.1 and Shri Udit Gupta, Advocate accepted notice for respondent No.2. Learned counsels for both the respondents undertake to consider the issues raised in the writ petition and take appropriate decision in accordance with law.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents No.1 and 2 to treat this writ petition as a representation and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law and communicate the same to the petitioner.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ravinder Yadav
- respondent
BSES
Coram
Jayant Nath
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court