Petition for appointment of petitioner as Personal Assistant withdrawn after RTI application remained pending. Court dismissed both petition and application on withdrawal.
Petition and RTI application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
RAVI SHANKAR SAHU ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Amit Kr. Chawla, Adv.
versus
JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P.VAISH
%
O R D E R 08.03.2016
The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to the respondent to give an appointment as Personal Assistant to the petitioner.
After some arguments, Mr.Amit Kumar Chawla, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has moved an application under Right to Information Act, 2005 and reply to the same has not been received till date.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition as well as application with liberty to file a fresh petition after obtaining reply under Right to Information Act, 2005.
As prayed, the petition as well as application are dismissed as withdrawn.
V.P.VAISH, J
MARCH 08, 2016/ gm
RAVI SHANKAR SAHU
JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY
V.P. VAISH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
