A single judge dismissed the public interest petition filed by S.K. Jindal, a Central Warehousing Corporation employee, seeking directions for corruption investigation. The court held the petition was not maintainable as an identical issue was previously dismissed in W.P.(C) No.4235/2014.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
S.K. JINDAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sarvesh Bisaria, Adv.
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr.K.K. Tyagi, Adv. for R-2. Ms.Rajdipa Behura, SPP for CBI with Ms.Monica Gupta and Ms.Garima Singh Yadav, Advs. for CBI. Mr.R.V.Sinha with Mr.A.S. Singh, Advs. for CVC. Mr.R.D. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.T.Singhvi and Ms.Pallavi Shali, Advs. for UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
%
O R D E R 14.03.2016
W.P.(C) No.4235/2014 filed by the petitioner raising the very same issue was already dismissed.
CHIEF JUSTICE
JAYANT NATH, J
MARCH 14, 2016 /pmc
W.P.(C) 1322/2016
Page 2 of 2.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is estopped from filing a writ petition seeking investigation into corruption against Central Warehousing Corporation officials after a prior petition on the same issue was dism
Whether this Court can exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 to grant the very same relief sought in a previously dismissed petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.K. Jindal
Union of India
Jayant Nath
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
