Petitioner sought extension for LL.B. course. Court directed University of Delhi to dispose of the pending representation within two weeks via order dasti.
Direction to university to dispose of petitioner's representation dated 22-10-2015 within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
MANOJ KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate.
versus
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Mohinder J.S.Rupal, Advocate for R-1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondent no.2 (Law Centre I, Delhi University) to grant extension of one year to petitioner to complete his LL.B. course.
A perusal of the paper book reveals that the petitioner’s representation dated 22nd October, 2015 to the Vice-Chancellor at page 29 of the paper book has not been disposed of till date.
Consequently, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.1 to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 22nd October, 2015 within a period of two weeks. Order dasti .
MANMOHAN, J
MARCH 04, 2016 KA
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petition for extension of time to complete LL.B. course should be disposed of by directing the university to decide the representation.
Manoj Kumar
University of Delhi
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
