This order handles the withdrawal of Writ Petition (C) 3366/2014 by the petitioner. The court allowed the connected withdrawal application and dismissed the main writ petition as withdrawn.
Withdrawal of W.P.(C) 3366/2014 allowed; connected application allowed; main W.P. dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14 $~
SARITA GAUTAM ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Shekhar Goyal and Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocates.
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Namrata Mukim, Advocate for Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Advocate for SDMC.
Mr. Vaibhav Agnihotri, Advocate for DDA.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 03.03.2016
CM Appl. 8140/2016 (for exemption)
Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
CM Appl. 8139/2016 in W.P.(c) 3366/2014
Present application has been filed for withdrawal of the writ petition. Consequently, present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Accordingly, the application stands allowed.
MANMOHAN, J
MARCH 03, 2016 js
SARITA GAUTAM
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
Manmohan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
