Petitioners sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings subsequently. The Court dismissed the petition and the application as withdrawn on the grounds.
Withdrawal of the writ petition and the application allowed with liberty to file appropriate proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
MOHD SHAHID & ORS ..... Petitioners
Through Mr.P.Chakraborty, Advocate.
versus
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI AND ANR
| ..... Respondents | |
|---|---|
| Through | Mr.Vinod Kumar Bhati, Advocate for GNCTD. |
| Mr.Arjun Pant, Advocate for R-2/ DDA. |
|
| Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate for R- 3/DAMB. |
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R % 03.03.2016
After some arguments, Mr.P.Chakraborty, learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file appropriate proceeding in accordance with the law.
With the aforesaid liberty, the present writ petition and the application are dismissed as withdrawn.
However, this Court clarifies that it has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the controversy. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.
MANMOHAN, J
MARCH 03, 2016 KA
MOHD SHAHID & ORS
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI AND ANR
MANMOHAN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
