Disposed¶25

Loknath Patel v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC6 Jan 2026WPC/22/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; WPC No. 22 of 2026; Loknath Patel v. State of Chhattisgarh and others; challenge to Tehsildar Bhatapara's order dated 20.08.2025 rejecting mutation application; loan against property cleared, no impediment to registration; grievance redressed; petition disposed of without adjudication; Article 226; single bench of Narendra Kumar Vyas, J.; decided 07.01.2026.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief adjudicated; the writ petition was disposed of with the observation that the petitioner's grievance stands redressed. ¶25

Loknath Patel Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Writ and Judicial Review | Chhattisgarh HC (2026)

2026:CGHC:1000

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPC No. 22 of 2026

¶6

1. Loknath Patel S/o Shri Neelkanth Patel Aged About 47 Years R/o Santoshi Ward, Vrindavan Basti, Kumharpara, Jagdalpur, Tehsil Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar, Chhattisgarh.

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

versus

¶9

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶10

2. Commissioner Raipur Division, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶11

3. Collector Balodabazar Bhatapara, Distt. Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.

¶12

4. Sub Divisional Officer (R) Bhatapara, Distt. Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.

¶13

5. Tahsildar Bhatapara, Distt. Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.

¶14

... Respondent(s)

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr. Manuraj Singh, Advocate For State : Mr. Vivek Verma, Government Advocate

¶16

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

¶17

Order on Board

¶18

07.01.2026

¶19

The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 20.08.2025 passed by the Tehsildar Bhatapara by which the petitioner’s application for

¶20

Digitally signed by MANISH MANISH YADAV YADAV Date: 2026.01.08 17:46:01 +0530

¶21

¶22

mutation of the land in dispute has been rejected.

¶23

It has been informed by the learned State counsel that there was a loan against the property owned by the petitioner and now that land has been cleared and there is no other impediment in registration of the property. Now the said issue has already been redressed, therefore, there will be no difficulty for the Tahsildar to continue with the proceedings.

¶24

In view of the statement made by the learned State counsel, since the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, nothing is required to be adjudicated at this juncture.

¶25

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶26

Sd/(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge

¶27

Manish

Loknath Patel v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Loknath Patel v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prasanna Kumar Ekka Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ambalal Jhara Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Yes Bank Limited Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Triveni Bai Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sanjay Sundarani Vs Municipal Corporation Raipur

Chhotelal Prajapati Vs State of Chhattisgarh