Dismissed¶26
Ghasnin Bai v. Gendram
Chhattisgarh HCSA/124/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, SA No. 124 of 2017 (appellants Ghasnin Bai, Gangabai, Jamuna Bai and Kachra Bai v. respondents Gendram, Manoj and Lekhram, Rajnandgaon): appeal dismissed for want of prosecution on 09.04.2026 by Bibhu Datta Guru, J., as none appeared for the appellants on repeated calls and they were found to have lost interest. Shri Ujjawal Agrawal appeared for respondent Nos. 1-3 on behalf of Shri Mahesh Pandey; no counsel for appellants. Short non-prosecution order; no merits, quantum, statutes or precedents.
What did the court decide?
The appellant has lost interest in pursuing the present matter, as none appeared nor any representation was made on repeated calls. ¶24