Case brief
What is this about?
SA No. 543 of 2016, Ramkhilawan and Premchand (plaintiffs/appellants) versus Dujram, Samaruram and State of Chhattisgarh (defendants/respondents), High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, decided 09/04/2026 by Bibhu Datta Guru, J. Cause title taken from CIS; neutral citation 2026:CGHC:16331. Counsel: none for appellants ('For Appellants : None'); Mr. Somnath Verma, Advocate for Respondents No.1 & 2; Mr. Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer for State. On repeated calls nobody appeared for the appellants; the Court recorded that the appellants had lost interest and dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. Purely procedural dismissal — no ratio on the underlying civil dispute, no statute or precedent engaged, no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
The appellants have lost interest in pursuing the present matter. ¶23