Second regular bail application in a cheating and forgery case arising from fraudulent sale of a landowner's property using forged Aadhaar card and bank account. The court found the applicant's role graver than co-accused already released and dismissed the bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 3101 of 2024
VERSUS
------- Non-applicant For applicants : Mr. Shikhar Bakhtiyar, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Anurag Jha, Advocate For Non-applicants-State : Mr. Praveen Das, Dy. Advocate General For Objector : Mr. Rishikant Mahobia, Advocate
SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
ORDER ON BOARD
08/07/2024
2
crime was registered and the applicant was arrested.
3
nature of allegations, submission of learned counsel for the respective parties as also, the role which is played by the applicant of arranging meeting of the 02 persons who have purchased the land from N. Ramesh and has executed the sale deed, I do not find present to be a fit case to allow the application for grant of bail.
Certified copy as per rules.
Sd/(Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge
Dey
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant, accused of fraudulently selling complainant's land by forged documents and arranging meetings with purchasers, deserved regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rakesh Kumar Rai
State of Chhattisgarh through Station House Officer, Police Station Supela, District Durg
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
