An Hon'ble Judge allowed condonation of delay and leave to prefer an appeal under Section 378(4) CrPC. The court directed registration of a regular acquittal appeal.
Condoned of delay; leave to prefer appeal allowed; direction to register acquittal appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CRMP No. 196 of 2024
Sudama Prasad Shukla Versus Avanish Tripathi And Another
| 19.01.2024 | Mr. Achyut Tiwari, Counsel for the Petitioner. Heard on I.A. No. 01/2024, an application for condonation of delay in filing the petition under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. On due consideration and for the reasons assigned therein which is duly supported by an affidavit, I am inclined to allow the same. The application is allowed and the delay is accordingly, condoned. Also heard on an application seeking leave to prefer an appeal under Section 378(4) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. On due consideration, the application is allowed and the petition is disposed off. Registry is directed to register a regular acquittal appeal and list the matter thereafter for consideration on admission. |
|---|---|
| Sd/- | |
| (Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge |
Alfiza
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to condone delay in filing an application under Section 378(4) CrPC.
Whether to grant leave to prefer an appeal under Section 378(4) CrPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sudama Prasad Shukla
Avanish Tripathi
Another
Sanjay S. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
