Dismissed
Pawan Kumar v. Vikas Kumar
Chhattisgarh HCMAC/598/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This appellant filed no reply to their non-appearance at the hearing resulted in dismissal of the appeal for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Page 1 of 1
¶2
NAFR
¶3
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
¶4
MAC No. 598 of 2020
¶5
- Pawan Kumar S/o Late Shri Ganpat Ram Sharma, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Ward No. 16, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, At Present Behind Pujari School, Beside Kothari Institute, Raja Talab, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).
¶6
---- Appellant/ Claimant
¶7
Versus
¶8
- Vikas Kumar S/o Rajkumar Santwani, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Ward No. 14, Sindhi Colony, Jarhabhatha, Police Station Civil Line, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh (Driver Of Car I-22 No. C.G.-10-H-7770).
¶9
- Smt. Prabha Bajaj W/o Vijay Bajaj, R/o Laxmi Provision Stores, Sindhi Colony, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. (Owner Of Car I-22 No. C.G.-10-H-7770).
¶10
- The New India Insurance Company Limited, Through The Branch Manager, Branch Office Second Floor, Rama Trade Center, In Front Of Rajeev Plaza, Old Bus Stand Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. (Insurer Of Car I-22 No. C.G.-10-H-7770)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Pawan Kumar S/o Late Shri Ganpat Ram Sharma
- respondent
Vikas Kumar S/o Rajkumar Santwani
- respondent
Smt. Prabha Bajaj W/o Vijay Bajaj
- respondent
The New India Insurance Company Limited
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- MAC/598/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court