The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal proposition is laid down as the court did not engage with the merits of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPC No. 2232 of 2015
Versus
| ---- Respondents | |
|---|---|
| 01.02.2023 | Ms. Samiksha Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner on behalf of Manay Nath Thakur, Advocate. |
| S hri Ghanshyam Patel, Govt. Advocate for the State. |
|
| Shri Sudhir Bajpai, Advocate for respondents No.4&5. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition. |
|
| Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge |
Inder
Vijay Kumar Pritvani
State Of Chhattisgarh
Union Of India
Chhattisgarh State Level Appraisal Committee
Chairman, Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board
Member Secretary, State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
