The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the rejection of compassionate appointment. The court held that since the petitioner's married husband holds government employment, she is not a dependent, and the rejection was legal and not arbitrary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 2904 of 2022
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioner : Mr. Shivanshu Pandey, Advocate For State : Mr. R.M. Solapurkar, Govt. Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Mr. K. Rohan, Advocate under instructions of Mr. Abhyuday Singh, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board
06/05/2022
2
Sd/-
(P. Sam Koshy) Judge
Ved
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the rejection of compassionate appointment candidature due to husband's government employment is bad in law or arbitrary.
Rashmi Soni
State Of Chhattisgarh
Commissioner Office Of Municipal Corporation
Principal Lal Bahadur Shastri, Government Higher Secondary School
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
