Writ petition marked as withdrawn and dismissed. Counsel for the petitioner prayed for withdrawal of the petition, which the court granted.
The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPS No. 167 of 2022
Versus
| 05.05.2022 | Ms. Naushina Ali, Counsel for Petitioner. Mr. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer, for State. Mr. Bhupendra Singh, Counsel for Respondent No. 5. Counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. |
|---|---|
| Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE |
J
Anubhuti Kumari
State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, School Education Department
Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction
Deputy Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction
Pushpanjali
Tanvi Singh
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
