Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition. The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw granted; Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP227 No. 599 of 2022
Versus
1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, (Revenue) New Mantralaya (Rakhi Village), Naya Raipur District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. The Commissioner Division Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. The Collector Balodabazar, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh
4. The Sub- Divisional Officer Sub- Division Simga, Tahsil Simga, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh
5. The Nayab Tahsildar Suhela, Village Sub Tahsil- Suhela, TahsilSimga, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh
6. Prahalad Singh Thakur S/o Jodhan Singh Thakur Aged About 74 Years R/o Village- Suhela, P. H. No. 34 Revenue Circle- Jaraud, Sub Tahsil- Suhela, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondents
CAUSE TITLE TAKEN FROM CIS PERIPHERY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Petitioner : Ms. Saloni Verma, Adv. For respondent/State : Mr. Sudhir Sahu, PL. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order On Board
10.11.2022
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of
this Court to withdraw the petition.
On due consideration, permission granted. This writ petition is
dismissed as withdrawn .
Sd/-
(Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge
Ajay
Ripusudan Verma
The State Of Chhattisgarh
Deepak Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
