This is a one-line dismissal of a writ petition in Chhattisgarh. The court dismissed the matter because the petitioner's counsel submitted that the dispute had been amicably settled.
The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP227 No. 287 of 2021
--- Petitioner
Versus
1. K. Dharam Rao Late K. Jagganath Aged About 66 Years R/o House No. 17/385, Behind Professor Colony, Near Malviya School, Deepak Nagar, Tehsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh
2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Tehsildar, Tehsil And District Durg, Durg Chhattisgarh --- Respondents.
CAUSE TITLE TAKEN FROM CIS PERIPHERY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Applicant : Ms. Saloni Verma on behalf of Mr. Harshwardhan Parganiha, Adv. For respondent No.1 : Ms. Surya Kawalkar Dangi, Adv. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order On Board
10.11.2022
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that out of the
Court the matter has amicably settled between the parties therefore, she does not want to press this writ petition.
In view of the aforesaid submission, this writ petition is dismissed as
not pressed.
Sd/-
(Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge
Ajay
K. Swarupa W/o K. Kiran Kumar
K. Dharam Rao Late K. Jagganath
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Tehsildar
Deepak Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
